The engineer accused of fatally shooting one employee and wounding five others at the firm where he once worked is "very mentally ill" and crumbled under the stress of his divorce, bankruptcy and unemployment, his attorney said Saturday.
Fort Hood shooter was psychologically disturbed by his own job citing stress-related thoughts after hearing his own patients post-war stories.
Comments
Tue, May 21, 2013 - 03:56 PM
Well done and well deserved Jonathan. You have served Pike County with pride and determination. You should apply f [...]
Tue, May 14, 2013 - 02:16 PM
It IS disturbing and a picture is worth a thousand words. Pike needs animal control.
Tue, May 14, 2013 - 01:40 PM
Three horses owned by this family have been attacked by dogs - only one was killed. I did not use the graphic pict [...]
Tue, May 14, 2013 - 10:57 AM
This picture of the dead horse is pretty disturbing. Why did you find it necessary to post that? The story is incr [...]
Mon, May 13, 2013 - 09:30 AM
I agree. I live on Melville Brown Rd and over the years have had to deal with abandoned animals. I am fed up. I ha [...]
Recent Stories
- Motorized carts not okay in city
- Thursday, May 23 2013
- Landscaping complete at courthouse
- Thursday, May 23 2013
- Memorial Day ceremony Monday at noon
- Thursday, May 23 2013
- Evangeline Marion Busby
- Wednesday, May 22 2013
- Public Notices
- Wednesday, May 22 2013
Archives
Did you read about the 2 German shepards that was stolen from the police officer in Griffin? It was reported one of them was shot too! hmmm.
Ronnie Chatsworth
If that bothers you life's tough.
Yes they could have escaped their cage...or someone could have let them out. People are mean (as you know). And are you positive these were the same dogs that were reported missing? People were still reporting sightings after the dogs were found.
So you really dont know.
Sorry, not going to happen.
I'm done with the dog discussion.
My orginal statement was about the "Mad Killers" running around our nation, so let's get back to that subject.
Would you be so kind as to point out where I said that you should let the dog attack you and your family??.... or how you came up with that conclusion when I merely stated that you cannot be sure the dogs were "running free" and the owner must not "want to keep them". I said that you dont know why or how the dogs got there so dont judge the owner of the dogs as being careless. But somehow that means that I want the dogs to attack you and your family. Really? Wow.
I just dont understand how you made certain connections and assumptions from what I posted. I do not advocate for dogs to run free nor do I think you should let them attack your family. That was not even implied ONCE in my post. You have an interesting way of connecting the dots. You would make a great politician... Avoid and redirect.
One, two, three.....you're all OUT at the old ball game! Here is the menu....pick your last meal.